Throughout the duration of the PEDs project, I made many contributions. I researched possible PEDs to use in the classroom and helped my group decide which kind of technology would be best to use for the class. Then, I helped write and edit the initial proposal and thought of some questions for the survey. When we went to the class to run the activity, I helped individual students in the class who were confused as to what to do or how to enter the online activity. After running the activity, I assisted with writing the project report.
I think our PEDs project was a success in the moment that we ran the activity, but not in the long-term. Our goal was to improve student engagement and their understanding of the topic (exponential functions.) The activity we introduced was a useful tool that we thought the students would be interested in and continue to use in order to enhance their understanding of the concept. The majority of the class was engaged in the activity and seemed to understand the concept easily, but it did not seem likely that they would be interested in doing the activity later, on their own. Therefore, I don’t think the activity will benefit their overall learning experience in the class.
If I could go back in time and change something about our PEDs project, I would make sure we communicated more with the teacher of the class we worked with (Mr. Daoud). There were a lot of misunderstandings when negotiating a day to go to the class and run the activity. There were many occasions when we thought we were supposed to go to the class, but realized that he was not expecting us to come on that day. Also, on the first attempt to run the activity, we realized that the class hadn’t learned enough about the topic to understand the activity, so we were unable to do it on that day. If we had explained everything to the teacher clearly, in the beginning, we would not have had these issues.
For next year’s IDC class, this project could be improved by reducing the amount of members in each group. In my group, there were six members, which made it difficult for everyone to make equal contributions and participate in all the activities. There were many times when one or two members of the group didn’t have anything to do, as only a few people were required to work on the task. There should not be more than four people in each group, so that everyone can be productive all the time, and no one will be left out. This is my only suggestion for improving the project, as every other aspect seemed to work well.